6 years ago
That makes fun of Jesus, the real messenger of God.
The article has the title “Christianity in 107 words” and reads:
The belief that a walking dead Jewish deity who was his own father although he always existed, commits suicide by cop, although he didn't really die, in order to give himself permission not to send you to an eternal place of torture that he created for you, but instead to make you live forever if you symbolically eat his flesh, drink his blood, and telepathically promise him you accept him as your master, so he can cleanse you of an evil force that is present in mankind because a rib-woman and a mud-man were convinced by a talking snake to eat from a magical tree. -- Anon. The whole thing would make Jesus die laughing, if he wasn't already dead, and assuming he ever existed.
This statement means that Judas will be the victim not Jesus and that Judas will be dressed by his shape of Jesus because he traded him. Such statement coincides with the Quran’s statement that assures that Jesus was never killed or crucified but some one other replaced him after being shaped with the same color and face like him as can seen in the following Quranic Verse:
However; two Gospels only described the scene of Jesus Crucifixion and record his loud cry as follows: Eloi, Eloi, Lema sabachtani, (according to English Copies of the Bible). As noted, the man, who cried, used a different slang than that of Jesus. It is near to the Arabic/Hebrew slang that was used by the residents of southern areas of Palestine in these times. Eloi means my God, as stated. Lema means also Why as translated in Gospels. But sabachtanic, according to English copy, does not mean forsaken me, but it means pigmented me. Sabcha (or sabgcha) means a pigment. So, there is a doubt concerning the man on the Cross because he used different language than Jesus, he is blaming God to pigment him (by another shape). Finally, he is crying loudly in a completely different manner than that of Jesus to declare that he is another pigmented man.